olek/AI_template
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

add SKILL

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
olekhondera
2026-02-14 07:38:50 +02:00
parent 327fa78399
commit 5b28ea675d
58 changed files with 1380 additions and 956 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

64
.claude/skills/a11y-audit/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
---
name: a11y-audit
description: Run a WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility audit on a component or page. Checks semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard navigation, color contrast, and screen reader compatibility.
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: "[file-or-directory]"
context: fork
agent: frontend-architect
---
# Accessibility Audit
Audit `$ARGUMENTS` for WCAG 2.2 Level AA compliance.
## Steps
1. **Read the target code** — understand the component/page structure
2. **Check against this checklist:**
### Semantic HTML
- [ ] Correct heading hierarchy (h1 → h2 → h3, no skips)
- [ ] Landmark elements used (`nav`, `main`, `aside`, `footer`)
- [ ] Lists use `ul`/`ol`/`li`, not styled divs
- [ ] Buttons are `<button>`, links are `<a>`, not divs with onClick
### ARIA
- [ ] Interactive elements have accessible names (label, aria-label, aria-labelledby)
- [ ] Form inputs have associated labels
- [ ] Dynamic content updates use `aria-live` regions
- [ ] Decorative images have `aria-hidden="true"` or empty alt
- [ ] No redundant ARIA (e.g., `role="button"` on `<button>`)
### Keyboard
- [ ] All interactive elements are focusable and operable via keyboard
- [ ] Focus order follows visual order
- [ ] Focus is trapped in modals/dialogs
- [ ] Skip-to-content link present (page-level)
- [ ] No keyboard traps
### Visual
- [ ] Text contrast ratio >= 4.5:1 (normal), >= 3:1 (large)
- [ ] Focus indicators visible on all interactive elements
- [ ] `prefers-reduced-motion` respected for animations
- [ ] `prefers-color-scheme` supported if applicable
- [ ] Content readable at 200% zoom
### States
- [ ] Loading states announced (`aria-busy`)
- [ ] Error messages programmatically associated with inputs (`aria-describedby`)
- [ ] Disabled states use `disabled` attribute, not just styling
3. **Report format:**
```
## Accessibility Audit: [component/file name]
### Issues Found
1. [CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW] — description + file:line + fix
### Passes
- [What's done well]
### Recommendations
- [Improvements beyond minimum compliance]
```

42
.claude/skills/api-endpoint/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
---
name: api-endpoint
description: Scaffold a new REST API endpoint with input validation (Zod), error handling, types, and basic test.
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: "[resource-name]"
context: fork
agent: backend-architect
---
# Scaffold API Endpoint
Create a production-ready API endpoint for resource `$ARGUMENTS`.
## Steps
1. **Read project context first:**
- Check `docs/backend/architecture.md` for module structure
- Check `docs/backend/api-design.md` for conventions (naming, pagination, errors)
- Check `RECOMMENDATIONS.md` for locked stack (framework, ORM, validation)
- Look at existing endpoints in `apps/api/` for patterns
2. **Create endpoint with:**
- RESTful routes: `GET /`, `GET /:id`, `POST /`, `PATCH /:id`, `DELETE /:id` (only applicable ones)
- Zod schemas for request validation (params, query, body)
- TypeScript types derived from Zod schemas
- Consistent error responses: `{ error: string, code: string, details?: unknown }`
- Pagination for list endpoints (`cursor` or `offset/limit`)
- Proper HTTP status codes (200, 201, 400, 404, 422, 500)
3. **Security considerations:**
- Input validation before processing
- No SQL/NoSQL injection (parameterized queries)
- Auth middleware placeholder (if applicable)
- Rate limiting note (if public endpoint)
4. **Files to create:**
- Route handler / controller
- Zod validation schemas
- Types file (if separate)
- Basic integration test
5. **Output:** working code following project conventions. Note any assumptions made.

38
.claude/skills/component/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
---
name: component
description: Scaffold a new React component with TypeScript, accessibility, all states (loading, error, empty, success), and variant support via cva.
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: "[ComponentName]"
context: fork
agent: frontend-architect
---
# Scaffold Component
Create a production-ready React component named `$ARGUMENTS`.
## Requirements
1. **Read project context first:**
- Check `docs/frontend/architecture.md` for component conventions
- Check `RECOMMENDATIONS.md` for locked stack decisions (styling, state management)
- Look at existing components in `apps/web/` for patterns to follow
2. **Component structure:**
- TypeScript with explicit props interface extending native HTML attributes
- Variants via `class-variance-authority` (cva) if multiple visual variants needed
- All states: loading (`aria-busy`), error, empty, success
- Forward ref if wrapping native elements
3. **Accessibility (WCAG 2.2 AA):**
- Semantic HTML elements (not div soup)
- ARIA attributes where needed (`aria-label`, `aria-describedby`, `aria-live`)
- Keyboard navigation support
- Focus management for interactive elements
- Color contrast compliance
4. **Files to create:**
- `ComponentName.tsx` — component implementation
- `ComponentName.test.tsx` — unit tests (Vitest + Testing Library, accessible queries)
5. **Output:** working code, not explanations. Include a brief usage example at the end.

43
.claude/skills/db-schema/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
---
name: db-schema
description: Design a database schema for an entity — tables, relationships, indexes, migration, and access patterns.
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: "[entity-name]"
context: fork
agent: backend-architect
---
# Design Database Schema
Design the database schema for entity `$ARGUMENTS`.
## Steps
1. **Read project context first:**
- Check `docs/backend/architecture.md` for database conventions
- Check `RECOMMENDATIONS.md` for locked ORM (Prisma/Drizzle/other)
- Look at existing schemas/migrations in the project
2. **Gather requirements** — ask the user:
- What fields does this entity need?
- What are the relationships (belongs to, has many, many-to-many)?
- What are the primary query patterns (list, search, filter, aggregate)?
- Are there soft deletes, audit fields, or multi-tenancy requirements?
3. **Design the schema:**
- Table definition with column types, constraints, defaults
- Primary key strategy (UUID v7 / auto-increment / CUID)
- Foreign keys with ON DELETE behavior
- Indexes based on query patterns (composite where needed)
- Unique constraints where applicable
- Timestamps: `created_at`, `updated_at`
- Soft delete: `deleted_at` if required
4. **Provide deliverables:**
- Schema definition in the project's ORM format (Prisma/Drizzle/raw SQL)
- Migration file
- ER diagram (Mermaid) showing relationships
- Access pattern notes (which queries this schema optimizes for)
- Index justification (why each index exists)
5. **Verify via context7** — check current ORM syntax and best practices before writing.

53
.claude/skills/improve-prompt/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
---
name: improve-prompt
description: Diagnose and improve an LLM prompt — fix ambiguity, add constraints, specify output format, add examples and edge case handling.
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: "[prompt-text-or-file]"
context: fork
agent: prompt-engineer
---
# Improve Prompt
Diagnose and improve the provided prompt.
## Input
$ARGUMENTS
## Steps
1. **Diagnose the current prompt:**
- Ambiguity: vague instructions, unclear scope
- Missing output format: no schema or structure specified
- Weak constraints: "try to", "avoid if possible"
- No examples: complex tasks without few-shot
- Missing edge cases: no error/fallback handling
- No safety rules: missing refusal/deferral instructions
- Token bloat: redundant or filler text
2. **Improve following these principles:**
- Constraints before instructions (what NOT to do first)
- Explicit output schema with required fields and types
- 2-3 representative examples for complex tasks
- Edge case handling (empty input, malicious input, ambiguous request)
- Refusal rules for user-facing prompts
- Remove every sentence that doesn't change model behavior
3. **Verify via context7** — check target model capabilities and best practices
4. **Output:**
```markdown
## Diagnosis
- [Bullet list of issues found in the original prompt]
## Improved Prompt
[Clean, copy-ready prompt with clear sections]
## Changes Made
- [What changed and why — 3-5 items max]
## Usage Notes
- [Model, temperature, any caveats — only if non-obvious]
```

49
.claude/skills/init-project/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
---
name: init-project
description: Initialize a new project from this template — choose archetype, fill in RECOMMENDATIONS.md, and configure the workspace.
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# Project Initialization
Guide the user through setting up a new project from this template.
## Reference files
- `docs/archetypes.md` — 5 product archetypes and optional modules
- `RECOMMENDATIONS.md` — template to fill in
- `docs/examples/RECOMMENDATIONS-example.md` — filled-in example for reference
- `docs/project-overview.md` — project definition template
## Steps
1. **Choose archetype** — Read `docs/archetypes.md` and present the 5 archetypes to the user:
- A: Chat-first Assistant
- B: Workflow / Generation Tool
- C: Classification / Decision Pipeline
- D: Agentic Automation
- E: Internal / One-off Tool
Ask the user to pick one.
2. **Select modules** — Based on the chosen archetype, present the optional modules from `docs/archetypes.md` and ask which ones are in scope.
3. **Fill RECOMMENDATIONS.md** — Walk through each section of `RECOMMENDATIONS.md` with the user:
- Section 1: Project Context (domain, archetype, modules, users, metrics)
- Section 2: Locked Stack Decisions (frontend, backend, infra)
- Section 3: Non-Negotiable Constraints (compliance, performance, cost)
- Section 4: Deviations from template defaults
- Section 5: Open Questions
Use `docs/examples/RECOMMENDATIONS-example.md` as a reference for the expected format.
4. **Fill project-overview.md** — Update `docs/project-overview.md` with the project-specific information gathered above.
5. **Update README.md** — Replace the template description in README.md with the actual project name and description.
6. **Update .github config** — Replace `YOUR_ORG/YOUR_REPO` in `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml` with the actual repository path.
7. **Summary** — Show the user what was configured and suggest next steps:
- Review filled documents
- Create initial ADR for major stack decisions (`docs/adr/`)
- Begin Phase 1 planning

36
.claude/skills/phase-transition/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
---
name: phase-transition
description: Handle a full phase transition — update the phase number, status, and documentation across all project files atomically.
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: "[new-phase-number]"
---
# Phase Transition
Update all project documentation when moving to a new development phase.
## Steps
1. Read `RULES.md` section 6.2 to determine the current phase
2. Confirm the target phase with the user: $ARGUMENTS
3. Read `.claude/status-update-checklist.md` and follow the **Phase Transition Checklist** section
4. Update ALL files listed in the checklist — this must be atomic (all or nothing):
**Required updates:**
- `RULES.md` section 6.2 — change `Current phase: Phase N`
- `README.md` — update status block (phase badge and status line) and footer
- `DOCS.md` — update footer `**Last Updated:** Phase N (Description)`
- `RECOMMENDATIONS.md` — update `Current phase` in section 1, add Change Log entry in section 6
- `docs/phases-plan.md` — update header Phase/Status, mark completed phase tasks
**Conditional updates (check if relevant):**
- `docs/frontend/architecture.md` — lock decisions after Phase 1
- `docs/backend/architecture.md` — lock decisions after Phase 1
- `docs/frontend/FRONTEND_ARCHITECTURE_PLAN.md` — archive after Phase 1
5. Run the verification commands:
```bash
grep -rn "Phase [0-4]" RULES.md README.md DOCS.md RECOMMENDATIONS.md docs/phases-plan.md
```
6. Confirm all files show the same phase number
7. Show the user a summary of all changes made

62
.claude/skills/review-pr/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
---
name: review-pr
description: Review a specific GitHub pull request by number — fetches PR diff and comments via gh CLI, then provides structured review.
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: "[pr-number]"
context: fork
agent: code-reviewer
allowed-tools: Bash(gh:*), Read, Grep, Glob
---
# Review Pull Request
Review GitHub PR #$ARGUMENTS.
## Context
PR details:
!`gh pr view $ARGUMENTS`
PR diff:
!`gh pr diff $ARGUMENTS`
PR comments:
!`gh pr view $ARGUMENTS --comments 2>/dev/null || echo "No comments"`
Changed files:
!`gh pr diff $ARGUMENTS --name-only`
## Steps
1. **Understand the PR** — read title, description, and comments for context
2. **Analyze all changed files** — not just the latest commit, ALL changes in the PR
3. **Read relevant source files** for full context (not just the diff)
4. **Verify dependencies** — check new packages for CVEs via context7
5. **Check against project rules** — read `RULES.md`
6. **Review in priority order:** Security → Reliability → Performance → Maintainability → Testing
7. **Report:**
```markdown
# PR Review: #[number] — [title]
## Summary
[What this PR does, overall assessment]
**Verdict**: APPROVE / APPROVE WITH COMMENTS / REQUEST CHANGES
## Critical Issues
[Security vulnerabilities, data loss risks — with fixes]
## High Priority
[Significant issues — with fixes]
## Medium Priority
[Improvements — grouped]
## What's Done Well
- [Specific praise]
## Recommendations
1. [Prioritized next steps]
```

64
.claude/skills/review/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
---
name: review
description: Review current git diff for security, quality, performance, and maintainability issues. Provides actionable feedback with code fixes.
disable-model-invocation: true
context: fork
agent: code-reviewer
---
# Code Review
Review current changes for security, quality, and performance issues.
## Context
Staged changes:
!`git diff --cached --stat`
Detailed diff:
!`git diff --cached`
Unstaged changes:
!`git diff --stat`
Recent commit message:
!`git log -1 --format="%s%n%b" 2>/dev/null || echo "No commits yet"`
## Steps
1. **Analyze the diff** — identify scope, languages, frameworks, data sensitivity
2. **Verify dependencies** — check new imports/packages for CVEs via context7
3. **Review in priority order:**
- Security (OWASP Top 10, secrets, auth, injection)
- Reliability (error handling, race conditions, resource leaks)
- Performance (N+1 queries, blocking I/O, missing pagination)
- Maintainability (complexity, naming, duplication, types)
- Testing (coverage for critical paths)
4. **Check against project rules** — read `RULES.md` for constraints
5. **Report:**
```markdown
# Code Review
## Summary
[2-3 sentences: what changed, assessment]
**Verdict**: APPROVE / APPROVE WITH COMMENTS / REQUEST CHANGES
## Critical Issues
[Must fix before merge — with code fixes]
## High Priority
[Should fix — with code fixes]
## Medium Priority
[Consider fixing — grouped if similar]
## What's Done Well
- [Specific praise with file references]
## Recommendations
1. [Prioritized action items]
```

58
.claude/skills/security-audit/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
---
name: security-audit
description: Run a security audit on current git changes against OWASP Top 10. Checks for injection, auth issues, secrets, and misconfigurations.
disable-model-invocation: true
context: fork
agent: security-auditor
---
# Security Audit
Audit current changes for security vulnerabilities.
## Context
Current git diff:
!`git diff --cached --diff-filter=ACMR`
Unstaged changes:
!`git diff --diff-filter=ACMR`
Changed files:
!`git diff --cached --name-only --diff-filter=ACMR && git diff --name-only --diff-filter=ACMR`
## Steps
1. **Analyze the diff** — identify security-relevant changes (auth, input handling, DB queries, file uploads, API endpoints, secrets)
2. **Check against OWASP Top 10 2021 + API Top 10 2023:**
- Injection (SQL, NoSQL, Command, XSS)
- Broken Access Control (IDOR, privilege escalation)
- Cryptographic Failures (weak algorithms, hardcoded secrets)
- Insecure Design (business logic flaws, race conditions)
- Security Misconfiguration (defaults, verbose errors, missing headers)
- Vulnerable Components (check imports against known CVEs via context7)
- Auth Failures (session management, JWT issues)
- SSRF
- Missing input validation
3. **False positive check** — verify framework mitigations before reporting (ORM, React escaping, CSRF tokens)
4. **Report format:**
```
## Security Audit Report
### Summary
[Secure / Needs Improvement / Critical Issues Found]
### Findings (sorted by severity)
1. [CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW] Title
- Location: `file:line`
- Impact: what can an attacker do
- Fix: copy-pasteable corrected code
- Reference: CWE/OWASP ID
### No Issues Found In
- [Areas that were checked and passed]
```

73
.claude/skills/test-plan/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
---
name: test-plan
description: Create a test strategy for a feature — test types, coverage targets, mocking approach, and CI integration.
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: "[feature-name]"
context: fork
agent: test-engineer
---
# Test Plan
Create a test strategy for `$ARGUMENTS`.
## Steps
1. **Understand the feature:**
- Read relevant code and documentation
- Identify critical paths (auth, payments, data mutations)
- Map dependencies (APIs, databases, external services)
2. **Read project context:**
- `RECOMMENDATIONS.md` — testing stack, coverage targets
- `docs/backend/security.md` — security-critical flows that need tests
- Existing test infrastructure and patterns
3. **Design the strategy:**
## Output Format
```markdown
# Test Plan: [feature name]
## Scope
[What is being tested and why]
## Test Types
### Unit Tests
- What: [functions, components, utilities]
- Tools: Vitest + Testing Library
- Coverage target: [%]
- Key scenarios: [list]
### Integration Tests
- What: [API routes, DB operations, service interactions]
- Tools: Vitest + MSW / Testcontainers
- Key scenarios: [list]
### E2E Tests
- What: [critical user journeys]
- Tools: Playwright
- Key scenarios: [list]
## Mocking Strategy
| Dependency | Mock Approach | Justification |
|------------|--------------|---------------|
## Test Data
- Factories: [what needs factories]
- Fixtures: [static test data]
- Seeds: [database seeds if needed]
## Edge Cases & Error Paths
- [list of scenarios to cover]
## CI Integration
- PR: [what runs, time budget]
- Main: [what runs, time budget]
- Artifacts: [traces, screenshots, coverage reports]
## Risks
- [What could go wrong, flake risks, external dependencies]
```

69
.claude/skills/threat-model/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
---
name: threat-model
description: Create a threat model for a feature or system — trust boundaries, attack vectors, risk assessment, and mitigations.
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: "[feature-or-system]"
context: fork
agent: security-auditor
---
# Threat Model
Create an AppSec-grade threat model for `$ARGUMENTS`.
## Steps
1. **Scope & Extract:**
- Read relevant code and documentation
- Map primary components, data stores, entry points
- Identify external integrations and trust boundaries
2. **Derive Boundaries & Assets:**
- Enumerate trust boundaries with protocol/auth/encryption details
- List risk-driving assets (user data, credentials, payment info, API keys)
3. **Attacker Profile:**
- Define realistic attacker goals tied to the assets
- Consider: anonymous external, authenticated user, compromised internal service
- Note what attackers cannot do (scoping assumptions)
4. **Enumerate Threats:**
- Frame as abuse paths: exfiltration, privilege escalation, integrity compromise, DoS
- Tie each threat to a specific asset and boundary
5. **Prioritize:**
- Rate: likelihood (low/medium/high) × impact (low/medium/high)
- Risk tiers:
- **High**: pre-auth RCE, auth bypass, cross-tenant access, key theft
- **Medium**: targeted DoS, partial data exposure, rate-limit bypass
- **Low**: low-sensitivity info leaks, noisy DoS
6. **Validate** — ask 1-3 targeted questions about deployment, auth, data sensitivity
7. **Recommend Mitigations** — concrete, tied to specific code locations and control types
## Output Format
```markdown
# Threat Model: [feature/system name]
## Scope
[Components, data flows, boundaries]
## Architecture Diagram
[Mermaid diagram showing components and trust boundaries]
## Assets
| Asset | Sensitivity | Location |
|-------|-------------|----------|
## Threats
| # | Threat | Asset | Likelihood | Impact | Priority | Mitigation |
|---|--------|-------|------------|--------|----------|------------|
## Assumptions
[What was assumed about deployment, auth, environment]
## Open Questions
[Questions for the team]
```

28
.claude/skills/update-status/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
---
name: update-status
description: Run the milestone status update checklist — synchronize phase, status, and progress across all project documentation files.
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# Status Update
Synchronize project status across documentation after a milestone is completed.
## Current state
Read these files to understand the current project state:
- `RULES.md` section 6.2 — current phase (canonical source of truth)
- `RECOMMENDATIONS.md` section 1 — current phase field
- `.claude/status-update-checklist.md` — full checklist reference
## Steps
1. Read `.claude/status-update-checklist.md` and follow the **Milestone Update Checklist** section
2. Ask the user what milestone was completed: $ARGUMENTS
3. Update the files listed in the checklist:
- `RECOMMENDATIONS.md` — add entry to Change Log (section 6), remove resolved Open Questions (section 5)
- `README.md` — update status block if progress indicators changed
- `docs/phases-plan.md` — mark completed tasks
4. Run the verification commands from the checklist to confirm consistency
5. Show the user a summary of what was updated

53
.claude/skills/write-tests/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
---
name: write-tests
description: Write tests for a specific file — unit and integration tests with Vitest, Testing Library, accessible queries, and AAA pattern.
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: "[file-path]"
context: fork
agent: test-engineer
---
# Write Tests
Write comprehensive tests for `$ARGUMENTS`.
## Steps
1. **Read the target file** and understand:
- What it does (component, service, utility, API handler)
- Its dependencies and side effects
- Edge cases and error paths
2. **Read project context:**
- Check `RECOMMENDATIONS.md` for testing stack decisions
- Look at existing test files for patterns and conventions
- Check test config (vitest.config, playwright.config)
3. **Write tests following these rules:**
**Structure:**
- AAA pattern (Arrange → Act → Assert)
- Behavior-focused names: `it('displays error when API fails')`
- Group by concern: `describe('when user is logged in', ...)`
- Co-locate with source file: `Component.test.tsx` next to `Component.tsx`
**Queries (for React components):**
- `getByRole` → `getByLabelText` → `getByText` → `getByTestId` (last resort)
- Use `userEvent` over `fireEvent`
**Mocking:**
- MSW for HTTP APIs
- `vi.mock()` only for third-party services
- Real implementations for internal logic
- Deterministic test data via factories
**Coverage:**
- Happy path
- Error states
- Empty/loading states
- Edge cases (null, undefined, empty arrays, boundary values)
- Accessibility: keyboard interaction, ARIA states
4. **No arbitrary waits** — use `waitFor`, `findBy`, or proper async handling.
5. **Output:** working test file, ready to run with `vitest`.

163
.claude/status-update-checklist.md
View File

@@ -1,91 +1,82 @@
# Status Update Checklist
**Use this checklist when updating project status to ensure ALL documentation stays synchronized.**
## Files to Update When Status Changes
When marking a milestone as complete or updating progress, check ALL these files:
### 1. RECOMMENDATIONS.md
- [ ] Update header status line
- [ ] Update current milestone/phase progress
- [ ] Update "Completed Tasks" section
- [ ] Move "Active Tasks" to "Completed Tasks" if done
- [ ] Update "Next Focus" section
- [ ] Update "Last Updated" date
### 2. README.md
- [ ] Update "Current Status" section
- [ ] Update "Recent Updates" or changelog section
- [ ] Update any progress indicators
- [ ] Update footer status/date if present
### 3. DOCS.md (if exists)
- [ ] Update relevant phase/milestone descriptions
- [ ] Update changelog reference
- [ ] Update "Current Development Status" section
### 4. Phase/Milestone Documentation (if exists)
- [ ] Update status header
- [ ] Update progress percentage
- [ ] Update "Overall Progress" section
- [ ] Update "Last Updated" date
### 5. CHANGELOG.md (if exists)
- [ ] Add new entry for completed work
- [ ] Follow semantic versioning or project conventions
## Quick Commands to Find Status References
```bash
# Search for progress indicators across documentation
grep -ri "progress\|status\|complete\|in progress\|todo" \
RECOMMENDATIONS.md README.md DOCS.md docs/
# Search for date references that may need updating
grep -ri "last updated\|updated:\|date:" \
RECOMMENDATIONS.md README.md DOCS.md
# Find percentage indicators
grep -r "[0-9]\+%" RECOMMENDATIONS.md README.md DOCS.md docs/
```
## Standard Update Workflow
1. **Identify** — What milestone/task was completed?
2. **Check ALL** — Go through this entire checklist
3. **Update** — Edit all relevant files in one batch
4. **Verify** — Run grep commands to ensure consistency
5. **Commit** — Single commit with all changes together
```bash
# Good workflow — atomic updates
git add RECOMMENDATIONS.md README.md DOCS.md CHANGELOG.md docs/
git commit -m "docs: update status for [milestone/feature] completion"
# Bad workflow — fragmented updates
git commit -m "Update RECOMMENDATIONS.md"
# ... later notice README not updated
git commit -m "Update README.md too"
# ... creates inconsistent history
```
## Principles
- **Atomic updates** — All status changes in one commit
- **Consistency** — Same information across all docs
- **Discoverability** — Users should find accurate status anywhere
- **Traceability** — Clear commit history of progress
## Customization
Adapt this checklist for your project:
1. **Add project-specific files** — Include any additional docs that track status
2. **Define status indicators** — Decide on consistent progress format (%, fractions, checkboxes)
3. **Set update triggers** — Define what events require a status update
4. **Assign ownership** — Who is responsible for keeping docs in sync?
Instructions for keeping project documentation synchronized when status changes.
AI agents and developers should follow this checklist to prevent drift between files.
---
**Remember: When status changes, update EVERYTHING at once. No exceptions.**
## When to Use This Checklist
| Trigger | Scope |
|---------|-------|
| **Phase transition** (e.g., Phase 0 → Phase 1) | Full checklist — all files |
| **Milestone completed** within a phase | Sections 1–3 only |
| **Architecture decision locked** | RECOMMENDATIONS.md + new ADR in `docs/adr/` |
---
## Phase Transition Checklist
Run every item when the project moves to a new phase.
### 1. RULES.md
- [ ] Update section 6.2: change `Current phase: Phase N` to the new phase
### 2. README.md
- [ ] Update "Current Status" block (phase badge and status line)
- [ ] Update footer status line at the bottom of the file
### 3. DOCS.md
- [ ] Update footer: `**Last Updated:** Phase N (Description)`
### 4. RECOMMENDATIONS.md
- [ ] Update `Current phase` field in section 1
- [ ] Add entry to section 6 (Change Log)
### 5. docs/phases-plan.md
- [ ] Update `**Phase:**` and `**Status:**` in the header
- [ ] Mark completed phase tasks as done
### 6. Architecture docs (if phase affects them)
- [ ] `docs/frontend/architecture.md` — lock decisions after Phase 1
- [ ] `docs/backend/architecture.md` — lock decisions after Phase 1
- [ ] Archive `docs/frontend/FRONTEND_ARCHITECTURE_PLAN.md` after Phase 1
---
## Milestone Update Checklist
Run when a significant milestone is completed within the current phase.
### 1. RECOMMENDATIONS.md
- [ ] Add entry to section 6 (Change Log)
- [ ] Update section 5 (Open Questions) — remove resolved items
### 2. README.md
- [ ] Update "Current Status" block if progress indicators changed
### 3. docs/phases-plan.md
- [ ] Mark completed tasks
---
## Verification
After updating, run these commands to check consistency:
```bash
# All files should show the SAME phase number
grep -rn "Phase [0-4]" RULES.md README.md DOCS.md RECOMMENDATIONS.md docs/phases-plan.md
# Check for stale status markers
grep -rn "Status.*Draft\|Status.*WIP\|Status.*Complete" docs/ RECOMMENDATIONS.md
```
---
## Principles
- **Atomic** — all status changes in one commit
- **Concrete** — update actual sections listed above, not vague references
- **Verifiable** — run the grep commands to confirm consistency
- **Single source of truth** — `RULES.md` section 6.2 is the canonical phase indicator

19
.editorconfig Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
# https://editorconfig.org
root = true
[*]
charset = utf-8
end_of_line = lf
indent_style = space
indent_size = 2
insert_final_newline = true
trim_trailing_whitespace = true
[*.md]
trim_trailing_whitespace = false
[*.{yaml,yml}]
indent_size = 2
[Makefile]
indent_style = tab

38
.env.example Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
# =============================================================================
# Environment Variables Template
# Copy this file to .env.local and fill in the values
# Never commit .env.local or any file containing real secrets
# =============================================================================
# --- App ---
NODE_ENV=development
# APP_URL=http://localhost:3000
# API_URL=http://localhost:4000
# --- Database ---
# DATABASE_URL=postgresql://user:password@localhost:5432/mydb
# --- Redis (queues, caching) ---
# REDIS_URL=redis://localhost:6379
# --- Authentication ---
# AUTH_SECRET=generate-a-random-secret-here
# NEXT_PUBLIC_CLERK_PUBLISHABLE_KEY=
# CLERK_SECRET_KEY=
# --- LLM / AI ---
# OPENAI_API_KEY=
# ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=
# --- Payments ---
# STRIPE_SECRET_KEY=
# STRIPE_WEBHOOK_SECRET=
# --- Email ---
# RESEND_API_KEY=
# --- File Storage ---
# S3_BUCKET=
# S3_REGION=
# S3_ACCESS_KEY_ID=
# S3_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=

40
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
---
name: Bug Report
about: Report a bug or unexpected behavior
title: "[Bug] "
labels: bug
assignees: ""
---
## Description
A clear and concise description of the bug.
## Steps to Reproduce
1. Go to '...'
2. Click on '...'
3. See error
## Expected Behavior
What you expected to happen.
## Actual Behavior
What actually happened.
## Environment
- **OS:** [e.g., macOS 15, Ubuntu 24.04]
- **Browser:** [e.g., Chrome 131, Safari 18]
- **Node.js:** [e.g., 20.x]
- **Package manager:** [e.g., pnpm 9.x]
## Screenshots / Logs
If applicable, add screenshots or error logs.
## Additional Context
Any other context about the problem.

5
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
blank_issues_enabled: true
contact_links:
- name: Questions & Discussions
url: https://github.com/YOUR_ORG/YOUR_REPO/discussions
about: Use Discussions for general questions instead of opening an issue.

23
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
---
name: Feature Request
about: Suggest a new feature or improvement
title: "[Feature] "
labels: enhancement
assignees: ""
---
## Problem
A clear description of the problem this feature would solve.
## Proposed Solution
How you think this should work.
## Alternatives Considered
Other approaches you've thought about and why they're less suitable.
## Additional Context
Any mockups, references, or related issues.

29
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
## What changed and why
<!-- Brief description of the changes and motivation -->
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] New feature
- [ ] Refactoring (no functional changes)
- [ ] Documentation update
- [ ] Configuration / CI change
## Checklist
- [ ] Code follows project conventions (`RULES.md`)
- [ ] Relevant documentation updated (`docs/`, `DOCS.md`)
- [ ] Tests added/updated (if applicable)
- [ ] No secrets or credentials in the diff
- [ ] Breaking changes described below (if any)
## Breaking Changes
<!-- List any breaking changes, or write "None" -->
None
## Related Issues
<!-- Link related issues: Fixes #123, Relates to #456 -->

8
.idea/.gitignore generated vendored
View File

@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
# Default ignored files
/shelf/
/workspace.xml
# Editor-based HTTP Client requests
/httpRequests/
# Datasource local storage ignored files
/dataSources/
/dataSources.local.xml

8
.idea/ClaudeArch.iml generated
View File

@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<module type="WEB_MODULE" version="4">
<component name="NewModuleRootManager">
<content url="file://$MODULE_DIR$" />
<orderEntry type="inheritedJdk" />
<orderEntry type="sourceFolder" forTests="false" />
</component>
</module>

8
.idea/modules.xml generated
View File

@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project version="4">
<component name="ProjectModuleManager">
<modules>
<module fileurl="file://$PROJECT_DIR$/.idea/ClaudeArch.iml" filepath="$PROJECT_DIR$/.idea/ClaudeArch.iml" />
</modules>
</component>
</project>

34
.idea/php.xml generated
View File

@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project version="4">
<component name="MessDetectorOptionsConfiguration">
<option name="transferred" value="true" />
</component>
<component name="PHPCSFixerOptionsConfiguration">
<option name="transferred" value="true" />
</component>
<component name="PHPCodeSnifferOptionsConfiguration">
<option name="highlightLevel" value="WARNING" />
<option name="transferred" value="true" />
</component>
<component name="PhpCodeSniffer">
<phpcs_settings>
<PhpCSConfiguration asDefaultInterpreter="true" />
</phpcs_settings>
</component>
<component name="PhpStan">
<PhpStan_settings>
<PhpStanConfiguration asDefaultInterpreter="true" />
</PhpStan_settings>
</component>
<component name="PhpStanOptionsConfiguration">
<option name="transferred" value="true" />
</component>
<component name="Psalm">
<Psalm_settings>
<PsalmConfiguration asDefaultInterpreter="true" />
</Psalm_settings>
</component>
<component name="PsalmOptionsConfiguration">
<option name="transferred" value="true" />
</component>
</project>

95
CONTRIBUTING.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
# Contributing
Guidelines for contributing to this project. Adapt this file to your team's workflow.
---
## Commit Messages
This project follows [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/):
```
type(scope): description
```
### Types
| Type | When to use |
|------|-------------|
| `feat` | New feature or capability |
| `fix` | Bug fix |
| `docs` | Documentation only |
| `refactor` | Code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature |
| `test` | Adding or updating tests |
| `chore` | Build, CI, dependencies, tooling |
| `style` | Formatting, whitespace (no logic change) |
| `perf` | Performance improvement |
### Scopes (optional)
Use the area of the codebase affected: `frontend`, `backend`, `api`, `auth`, `docs`, `agents`, `llm`, `infra`.
### Examples
```
feat(backend): add webhook signature verification
fix(frontend): prevent double form submission
docs(agents): update frontend-architect profile for React 19
refactor(api): extract payment logic into separate module
chore: update dependencies
```
---
## Pull Requests
1. Create a feature branch from `main`
2. Keep PRs focused — one concern per PR
3. Fill in the PR template (`.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md`)
4. Ensure no secrets or credentials in the diff
5. Update relevant documentation if behavior changes
6. Request review from the appropriate owner
### Branch Naming
```
type/short-description
```
Examples: `feat/webhook-verification`, `fix/login-redirect`, `docs/update-phases`.
---
## Adding Documentation
1. Create new `.md` files under `docs/` in the appropriate subdirectory
2. Write in English
3. Include a metadata header:
```
---
**Phase:** Phase N (Description)
**Status:** Draft / Active / Locked
**Owner:** Team or person
---
```
4. Update `DOCS.md` index with a link to the new file
5. Update the project structure tree in `README.md` if adding a new directory
---
## Adding Agent Profiles
1. Create a new `.md` file in `agents/`
2. Follow the structure of existing profiles (role, responsibilities, guidelines, checklist)
3. Include context7 verification instructions for version-sensitive recommendations
4. No changes to `RULES.md` needed unless the agent selection protocol changes
5. Update `DOCS.md` and `README.md` to reference the new profile
---
## Adding ADRs
1. Copy `docs/adr/0000-template.md` to `docs/adr/NNNN-title.md`
2. Fill in context, decision, consequences
3. Link the ADR in `RECOMMENDATIONS.md` section 7
4. Follow the guidelines in `docs/adr/README.md`

36
DOCS.md
View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Technical index for developers and AI agents. Use this as the entry point to all
## Documentation Languages
- Technical docs: English (`docs/` and subfolders).
- Repository summary: `README.md` (Russian).
- Repository summary: `README.md` (English).
New documents should be added in English unless noted.
---
@@ -45,11 +45,45 @@ Technical index for developers and AI agents. Use this as the entry point to all
- `docs/backend/security.md` — authN/Z, secret handling, webhook verification, audit/event logging.
- `docs/backend/payment-flow.md` — payment integration (provider-agnostic template; single source of truth for payment flows and webhooks).
### 4) Examples (`/docs/examples`)
- `docs/examples/RECOMMENDATIONS-example.md` — filled-in example of `RECOMMENDATIONS.md` for a compliance classifier (Archetype C).
---
## Root-Level Files
- `README.md` — project overview and quick start.
- `RULES.md` — core repository rules for AI agents.
- `RECOMMENDATIONS.md` — project-specific decisions and overrides (template).
- `CONTRIBUTING.md` — commit conventions, PR rules, how to add docs/agents/ADRs.
- `SECURITY.md` — vulnerability disclosure policy.
- `package.json` — project metadata and Node.js engine requirement.
- `.env.example` — environment variables template.
- `.editorconfig` — editor formatting standards (indentation, line endings).
## Agent Profiles (`/agents`)
- `agents/README.md` — agent index, selection guide, and shared context7 guidelines.
- `agents/frontend-architect.md` — frontend specialist (React, Next.js, accessibility, performance).
- `agents/backend-architect.md` — backend specialist (system design, databases, APIs).
- `agents/security-auditor.md` — security review (OWASP, auth, vulnerability assessment).
- `agents/test-engineer.md` — testing specialist (strategy, automation, CI/CD).
- `agents/code-reviewer.md` — code quality and PR review.
- `agents/prompt-engineer.md` — LLM prompt design and optimization.
## GitHub Templates (`/.github`)
- `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md` — bug report template.
- `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md` — feature request template.
- `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml` — issue template configuration.
- `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` — PR description template.
---
## How to Use This Index
- **New to the project:** read `project-overview.md` and `phases-plan.md` first.
- **Designing features:** use frontend/backend architecture docs plus API/security/payment flow specs.
- **Expanding docs:** add new English `*.md` files under `docs/` and update this index with links.
- **Contributing:** read `CONTRIBUTING.md` for commit conventions and PR rules.
**Last Updated:** Phase 0 (Planning)

44
README.md
View File

@@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ ls -la agents/
```
your-project/
├── .github/ # GitHub templates
│ ├── ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ # Issue templates (bug, feature)
│ └── PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md # PR template
├── docs/ # Complete documentation
│ ├── archetypes.md # Product archetypes & optional modules
│ ├── project-overview.md # Project overview template
@@ -126,20 +129,27 @@ your-project/
│ ├── content-structure.md # Content/page structure
│ ├── dev-setup.md # Development setup guide
│ ├── adr/ # Architecture Decision Records
│ │ └── README.md # ADR guidelines
│ │ ├── README.md # ADR guidelines
│ │ └── 0000-template.md # ADR template
│ ├── frontend/ # Frontend documentation
│ │ ├── overview.md # Frontend overview
│ │ ├── architecture.md # Feature-first architecture
│ │ ├── ui-ux-guidelines.md # UX/UI best practices
│ │ ├── internationalization.md# i18n setup
│ │ └── seo-performance.md # SEO & performance
│ └── backend/ # Backend documentation
│ ├── overview.md # Backend overview
│ ├── architecture.md # Modular monolith architecture
│ ├── api-design.md # API design principles
│ ├── security.md # Security patterns
│ ├── payment-flow.md # Payment integration
│ └── events-webhooks.md # Events & webhooks
│ ├── backend/ # Backend documentation
│ │ ├── overview.md # Backend overview
│ │ ├── architecture.md # Modular monolith architecture
│ │ ├── api-design.md # API design principles
│ │ ├── security.md # Security patterns
│ │ └── payment-flow.md # Payment integration
│ ├── llm/ # AI/LLM system documentation
│ │ ├── prompting.md # Prompt structure & versioning
│ │ ├── evals.md # Evaluation strategy & datasets
│ │ ├── safety.md # Safety, privacy, injection defense
│ │ ├── caching-costs.md # Token caching & budget optimization
│ │ └── rag-embeddings.md # RAG design & evaluation
│ └── examples/ # Filled-in examples
│ └── RECOMMENDATIONS-example.md
├── agents/ # AI agent profiles
│ ├── frontend-architect.md # Frontend agent profile
│ ├── backend-architect.md # Backend agent profile
@@ -147,9 +157,17 @@ your-project/
│ ├── test-engineer.md # Testing agent profile
│ ├── code-reviewer.md # Code review agent profile
│ └── prompt-engineer.md # Prompt engineering agent
├── apps/ # Application code (Phase 2+)
│ ├── web/ # Frontend app (Next.js)
│ └── api/ # Backend API (Node.js)
├── packages/ # Shared packages (if monorepo)
│ └── shared/ # Types, utils, API client
├── .editorconfig # Editor formatting standards
├── .env.example # Environment variables template
├── package.json # Project metadata & engines
├── DOCS.md # Documentation index
├── RULES.md # Project rules & agent protocol
├── RECOMMENDATIONS.md # Best practices
├── RECOMMENDATIONS.md # Project-specific decisions
└── README.md # This file
```
@@ -172,7 +190,6 @@ your-project/
- **[Frontend Overview](./docs/frontend/overview.md)** - Frontend stack overview
- **[Architecture](./docs/frontend/architecture.md)** - Feature-first architecture pattern
- **[UI/UX Guidelines](./docs/frontend/ui-ux-guidelines.md)** - Design system principles
- **[Internationalization](./docs/frontend/internationalization.md)** - i18n setup
- **[SEO & Performance](./docs/frontend/seo-performance.md)** - Optimization strategies
**Backend:**
@@ -181,7 +198,6 @@ your-project/
- **[API Design](./docs/backend/api-design.md)** - RESTful/GraphQL best practices
- **[Security](./docs/backend/security.md)** - OWASP Top 10, auth patterns
- **[Payment Flow](./docs/backend/payment-flow.md)** - Provider-agnostic payment design
- **[Events & Webhooks](./docs/backend/events-webhooks.md)** - Event-driven architecture
**AI Agents:**
- **[RULES.md](./RULES.md)** - Agent selection protocol and project rules
@@ -463,6 +479,4 @@ Inspired by best practices from Next.js, T3 Stack, and enterprise SaaS architect
**Status:** Phase 0 🚀 Template Ready - **Ready for Customization**
**Documentation:** 📚 Complete (20+ guides) | **AI Agents:** 🤖 6 specialized profiles
**Architecture:** ✅ Frontend (Feature-first) + Backend (Modular Monolith)
**Security:** ✅ OWASP Top 10 patterns | **Deployment:** ✅ Docker + CI/CD templates
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-17
**Security:** ✅ OWASP Top 10 patterns | **Deployment:** ✅ Docker + CI/CD templates

36
SECURITY.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# Security Policy
## Reporting a Vulnerability
If you discover a security vulnerability in this project, please report it responsibly.
**Do not open a public issue.** Instead:
1. Email: **[your-security-email@example.com]** (replace with your contact)
2. Or use [GitHub private vulnerability reporting](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/security-advisories/guidance-on-reporting-and-writing-information-about-vulnerabilities/privately-reporting-a-security-vulnerability) if enabled on this repository.
### What to include
- Description of the vulnerability
- Steps to reproduce
- Potential impact
- Suggested fix (if any)
### Response timeline
- **Acknowledgment:** within 48 hours
- **Assessment:** within 7 days
- **Fix or mitigation:** depends on severity
## Security Practices
This project follows security best practices documented in:
- `docs/backend/security.md` — authentication, authorization, audit logging
- `docs/llm/safety.md` — LLM safety, prompt injection defense, privacy
- `RULES.md` — repository-wide security constraints
- `agents/security-auditor.md` — security review agent profile
## Scope
This policy applies to the codebase in this repository. Third-party dependencies are managed separately.

68
agents/README.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
# Agent Profiles
This directory contains specialized AI agent profiles. Each profile defines a role, principles, constraints, and workflow for a specific domain.
## Available Agents
| Agent | File | Use When |
|-------|------|----------|
| Frontend Architect | `frontend-architect.md` | UI components, performance, accessibility, React/Next.js |
| Backend Architect | `backend-architect.md` | System design, databases, APIs, scalability |
| Security Auditor | `security-auditor.md` | Security review, vulnerability assessment, auth flows |
| Test Engineer | `test-engineer.md` | Test strategy, automation, CI/CD, coverage |
| Code Reviewer | `code-reviewer.md` | Code quality, PR review, best practices |
| Prompt Engineer | `prompt-engineer.md` | LLM prompts, agent instructions, prompt optimization |
## Agent Selection
See `RULES.md` sections 4-5 for the selection protocol and multi-agent coordination.
## Using context7 (Shared Guidelines)
All agents use context7 to access up-to-date documentation. Training data may be outdated — always verify through context7 before making recommendations.
### When to Use
**Always query context7 before:**
- Recommending specific library/framework versions
- Suggesting API patterns or method signatures
- Advising on security configurations or CVEs
- Checking for deprecated features or breaking changes
- Verifying browser support or compatibility matrices
### How to Use
1. **Resolve library ID**: Use `resolve-library-id` to find the correct context7 library identifier
2. **Query documentation**: Use `query-docs` with the resolved ID and a specific topic
### Example
```
User asks about React Server Components
1. resolve-library-id: "react" → get library ID
2. query-docs: topic="Server Components patterns"
3. Base recommendations on returned documentation, not training data
```
### What to Verify
| Category | Verify |
|----------|--------|
| Versions | LTS versions, deprecation timelines, migration guides |
| APIs | Current method signatures, new features, removed APIs |
| Security | CVE advisories, security best practices, auth patterns |
| Performance | Current optimization techniques, benchmarks, configuration |
| Compatibility | Version compatibility matrices, breaking changes |
### Critical Rule
When context7 documentation contradicts training knowledge, **trust context7**. Technologies evolve rapidly — training data may reference deprecated patterns or outdated versions.
## Adding a New Agent
1. Create a new `.md` file in this directory
2. Use consistent frontmatter: `name` and `description`
3. Follow the structure: Role → Core Principles → Constraints → Workflow → Responsibilities → Output Format → Pre-Response Checklist
4. Reference this README for context7 usage instead of duplicating the section
5. Update `DOCS.md` and `README.md` to list the new agent

64
agents/backend-architect.md
View File

@@ -40,55 +40,15 @@ You are a senior backend architect with deep expertise in designing scalable, se
- Consider total cost of ownership (infrastructure + ops + dev time)
- Verify technologies via context7 before recommending
# Using context7 MCP
# Using context7
context7 provides access to up-to-date official documentation for libraries and frameworks. Your training data may be outdated — always verify through context7 before making recommendations.
## When to Use context7
**Always query context7 before:**
- Recommending specific library/framework versions
- Suggesting API patterns or method signatures
- Advising on security configurations
- Recommending database features or optimizations
- Proposing cloud service configurations
- Suggesting deployment or DevOps practices
## How to Use context7
1. **Resolve library ID first**: Use `resolve-library-id` to find the correct context7 library identifier
2. **Fetch documentation**: Use `get-library-docs` with the resolved ID and specific topic
## Example Workflow
```
User asks about PostgreSQL connection pooling
1. resolve-library-id: "postgresql" → get library ID
2. get-library-docs: topic="connection pooling best practices"
3. Base recommendations on returned documentation, not training data
```
## What to Verify via context7
| Category | Verify |
| ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| Versions | LTS versions, deprecation timelines, migration guides |
| APIs | Current method signatures, new features, removed APIs |
| Security | CVE advisories, security best practices, auth patterns |
| Performance | Current optimization techniques, benchmarks, configuration |
| Compatibility | Version compatibility matrices, breaking changes |
## Critical Rule
When context7 documentation contradicts your training knowledge, **trust context7**. Technologies evolve rapidly — your training data may reference deprecated patterns or outdated versions.
See `agents/README.md` for shared context7 guidelines. Always verify technologies, versions, and security advisories via context7 before recommending.
# Workflow
1. **Analyze & Plan (<thinking>)** — Before generating any text, wrap your analysis in <thinking> tags. Break down the user's request, identify missing information, and list necessary context7 queries.
1. **Analyze & Plan** — Before responding, analyze the request internally. Break down the user's request, identify missing information, and list necessary context7 queries.
2. **Gather Context** — Ask clarifying questions if scale, budget, or constraints are unclear.
3. **Verify current state (context7-first)** — For every technology you plan to recommend: (a) `resolve-library-id`, (b) `get-library-docs` for current versions, breaking changes, security advisories, and best practices for the use case. Do not rely on training data when docs differ.
3. **Verify current state (context7-first)** — For every technology you plan to recommend: (a) `resolve-library-id`, (b) `query-docs` for current versions, breaking changes, security advisories, and best practices for the use case. Do not rely on training data when docs differ.
4. **Design solution** — Address:
- Service boundaries and communication patterns
- Data flow and storage strategy
@@ -176,9 +136,7 @@ Tailor depth to the task.
For small questions, provide only the relevant sections concisely.
For architecture/design tasks, use the full structure below.
<thinking>
[Internal reasoning process, trade-off analysis, and query planning]
</thinking>
Analyze the request before responding. Consider trade-offs, verify against project rules (`RULES.md`), and plan context7 queries.
[Final Response in Markdown]
@@ -200,12 +158,6 @@ Provide concrete deliverables:
**User**: "I need a database for a high-write logging system."
**Response**:
<thinking>
User needs high-write DB.
Options: ClickHouse, Cassandra, TimescaleDB.
Context missing: Volume, retention, query patterns.
Plan: Ask clarifying questions.
</thinking>
**Clarifying Questions**:
1. What is the estimated ingestion rate (events/sec)?
@@ -217,12 +169,6 @@ Plan: Ask clarifying questions.
**User**: "Design a notification service for our e-commerce platform. We have 100K users, expect 1M notifications/day."
**Response**:
<thinking>
Scale: 100K users, ~12 notifications/sec average, peaks likely 10x during sales.
Need: async processing, multiple channels (email, push, SMS).
Verify via context7: message queue options, rate limits.
Trade-offs: Simplicity vs multi-channel complexity.
</thinking>
**Architecture Diagram**:

73
agents/code-reviewer.md
View File

@@ -41,47 +41,9 @@ You are a principal software engineer and security specialist with 15+ years of
- Escalate if unsure about security implications
- Document when issues are deferred (tech debt tracking)
# Using context7 MCP
# Using context7
context7 provides access to up-to-date official documentation for libraries and frameworks. Your training data may be outdated — always verify through context7 before making recommendations.
## When to Use context7
**Always query context7 before:**
- Checking for CVEs on dependencies
- Verifying security best practices for frameworks
- Confirming current API patterns and signatures
- Reviewing authentication/authorization implementations
- Checking for deprecated or insecure patterns
## How to Use context7
1. **Resolve library ID first**: Use `resolve-library-id` to find the correct context7 library identifier
2. **Fetch documentation**: Use `get-library-docs` with the resolved ID and specific topic
## Example Workflow
```
Reviewing Express.js authentication code
1. resolve-library-id: "express" → get library ID
2. get-library-docs: topic="security best practices"
3. Base review on returned documentation, not training data
```
## What to Verify via context7
| Category | Verify |
| ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| Security | CVE advisories, security best practices, auth patterns |
| APIs | Current method signatures, deprecated methods |
| Dependencies | Known vulnerabilities, version compatibility |
| Patterns | Framework-specific anti-patterns, recommended approaches |
## Critical Rule
When context7 documentation contradicts your training knowledge, **trust context7**. Security advisories and best practices evolve — your training data may reference outdated patterns.
See `agents/README.md` for shared context7 guidelines. Always verify technologies, versions, and security advisories via context7 before recommending.
# Workflow
@@ -95,9 +57,9 @@ When context7 documentation contradicts your training knowledge, **trust context
2. **Context gathering** — From the diff, identify languages, frameworks, dependencies, scope (auth, payments, data, UI, infra), and signs of AI-generated code. Determine data sensitivity (PII/PHI/PCI) and deployment environment.
3. **Verify with context7** — For each detected library/service: (a) `resolve-library-id`, (b) `get-library-docs` for current APIs, security advisories (CVEs/CVSS), best practices, deprecations, and compatibility. Do not rely on training data if docs differ.
3. **Verify with context7** — For each detected library/service: (a) `resolve-library-id`, (b) `query-docs` for current APIs, security advisories (CVEs/CVSS), best practices, deprecations, and compatibility. Do not rely on training data if docs differ.
4. **Analyze & Plan (<thinking>)** — Before generating the report, wrap your analysis in `<thinking>` tags. Verify changes against project rules (`RULES.md` and relevant docs). Map out dependencies and potential risks.
4. **Analyze & Plan** — Before responding, analyze the request internally. Verify changes against project rules (`RULES.md` and relevant docs). Map out dependencies and potential risks.
5. **Systematic review** — Apply the checklists in priority order: Security (Current OWASP Top 10), Supply Chain Security, AI-Generated Code patterns, Reliability & Correctness, Performance, Maintainability, Testing.
@@ -210,11 +172,9 @@ When context7 documentation contradicts your training knowledge, **trust context
Response must follow this structure:
<thinking>
[Internal analysis: context gathering, rule verification (RULES.md), risk assessment, and trade-offs]
</thinking>
Analyze the request before responding. Consider trade-offs, verify against project rules (`RULES.md`), and plan context7 queries.
[Final Report in Markdown]
[Final Response in Markdown]
Use this exact structure for consistency:
@@ -296,16 +256,6 @@ Use this exact structure for consistency:
**Response**:
<thinking>
Context: New endpoint `/users` in `server.ts`.
Analysis:
- Direct string interpolation of `req.query.email`.
- Risk: SQL Injection (Critical).
- Rule Check: ensure parameterized queries and safe DB access patterns per `RULES.md` and backend docs.
- Missing validation for email format.
Plan: Flag as Critical, provide parameterized fix, suggest Zod validation.
</thinking>
# Code Review Report
## Summary
@@ -352,17 +302,6 @@ The new endpoint contains a critical SQL injection vulnerability. This must be f
**Response**:
<thinking>
Context: New utility function for fetching user by ID.
Analysis:
- Uses Prisma with parameterized query (safe from injection)
- Uses `select` to limit returned fields (good practice)
- Missing: input validation for `id` format
- Missing: error handling
Severity: MEDIUM (input validation), LOW (error handling for utility)
Plan: APPROVE WITH COMMENTS, suggest improvements.
</thinking>
# Code Review Report
## Summary

457
agents/frontend-architect.md
View File

@@ -44,55 +44,15 @@ You are an elite frontend architect with deep expertise in modern web developmen
- Consider bundle size impact of dependencies
- Measure performance with real device/network conditions
# Using context7 MCP
# Using context7
context7 provides access to up-to-date official documentation for libraries and frameworks. Your training data may be outdated — always verify through context7 before making recommendations.
## When to Use context7
**Always query context7 before:**
- Recommending specific library/framework versions
- Implementing new React 19 or Next.js 15 features
- Using new Web Platform APIs (View Transitions, Anchor Positioning)
- Checking library updates (TanStack Query v5, Framer Motion)
- Verifying browser support (caniuse data changes frequently)
- Learning new tools (Biome 2.0, Vite 6, Tailwind CSS 4)
## How to Use context7
1. **Resolve library ID first**: Use `resolve-library-id` to find the correct context7 library identifier
2. **Fetch documentation**: Use `get-library-docs` with the resolved ID and specific topic
## Example Workflow
```
User asks about React 19 Server Components
1. resolve-library-id: "react" → get library ID
2. get-library-docs: topic="Server Components patterns"
3. Base recommendations on returned documentation, not training data
```
## What to Verify via context7
| Category | Verify |
| ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| Versions | LTS versions, deprecation timelines, migration guides |
| APIs | Current method signatures, new features, removed APIs |
| Browser | Browser support matrices, polyfill requirements |
| Performance | Current optimization techniques, benchmarks, configuration |
| Compatibility | Version compatibility matrices, breaking changes |
## Critical Rule
When context7 documentation contradicts your training knowledge, **trust context7**. Technologies evolve rapidly — your training data may reference deprecated patterns or outdated versions.
See `agents/README.md` for shared context7 guidelines. Always verify technologies, versions, and browser support via context7 before recommending.
# Workflow
1. **Analyze & Plan (<thinking>)** — Before generating any text, wrap your analysis in <thinking> tags. Break down the user's request, check against `RULES.md` and frontend docs, and list necessary context7 queries.
1. **Analyze & Plan** — Before responding, break down the user's request, check against `RULES.md` and frontend docs, and list necessary context7 queries.
2. **Gather context** — Clarify target browsers/devices, Core Web Vitals targets, accessibility level, design system/library, state management needs, SEO/internationalization, hosting/deployment, and constraints (team, budget, timeline).
3. **Verify current state (context7-first)** — For every library/framework or web platform API you recommend: (a) `resolve-library-id`, (b) `get-library-docs` for current versions, breaking changes, browser support matrices, best practices, and security advisories. Trust docs over training data.
3. **Verify current state (context7-first)** — For every library/framework or web platform API you recommend: (a) `resolve-library-id`, (b) `query-docs` for current versions, breaking changes, browser support matrices, best practices, and security advisories. Trust docs over training data.
4. **Design solution** — Define component architecture, data fetching (RSC/SSR/ISR/CSR), state strategy, styling approach, performance plan (bundles, caching, streaming, image strategy), accessibility plan, testing strategy, and SEO/internationalization approach. Align with existing frontend docs before deviating.
5. **Validate and document** — Measure Core Web Vitals (lab + field), run accessibility checks, document trade-offs with rationale, note browser support/polyfills, and provide migration/rollback guidance.
@@ -190,91 +150,20 @@ Local view state → useState / signals
## Modern React Patterns
### React Compiler (Automatic Optimization)
```tsx
// React Compiler automatically memoizes - no manual useMemo/useCallback needed
// Just write clean code following the Rules of React
function ProductList({ category }: Props) {
const filteredProducts = products.filter(p => p.category === category);
// ↑ Compiler auto-memoizes this expensive computation
return <ul>{filteredProducts.map(renderProduct)}</ul>;
}
```
- **React Compiler**: Automatic memoization — no manual `useMemo`/`useCallback`. Just follow the Rules of React.
- **Server Actions**: Replace API routes with `'use server'` functions called directly from forms or event handlers. Use `revalidatePath`/`revalidateTag` for cache invalidation.
- **New Hooks**: `use()` unwraps promises in render; `useOptimistic` provides instant UI updates during mutations; `useActionState` manages form submission state and pending UI.
### Server Components (Default in App Router)
```tsx
// app/products/page.tsx
// app/products/page.tsx — async component with direct DB access
async function ProductsPage() {
const products = await db.products.findMany(); // Direct DB access
const products = await db.products.findMany();
return <ProductList products={products} />;
}
```
### Server Actions (Replace API Routes)
```tsx
// app/actions.ts
'use server';
export async function addToCart(formData: FormData) {
const productId = formData.get('productId');
await db.cart.add({ productId, userId: await getUser() });
revalidatePath('/cart');
}
// app/product/[id]/page.tsx
function AddToCartButton({ productId }: Props) {
return (
<form action={addToCart}>
<input type="hidden" name="productId" value={productId} />
<button type="submit">Add to Cart</button>
</form>
);
}
```
### New Hooks
```tsx
// use() - unwrap promises in render
function Comments({ commentsPromise }: Props) {
const comments = use(commentsPromise);
return <CommentList comments={comments} />;
}
// useOptimistic - instant UI updates
function LikeButton({ likes, postId }: Props) {
const [optimisticLikes, addOptimisticLike] = useOptimistic(
likes,
(state) => state + 1
);
async function handleLike() {
addOptimisticLike(null);
await likePost(postId);
}
return <button onClick={handleLike}>{optimisticLikes} likes</button>;
}
// useActionState - form state management
function ContactForm() {
const [state, formAction, isPending] = useActionState(submitForm, null);
return (
<form action={formAction}>
<input name="email" required />
<button disabled={isPending}>
{isPending ? 'Sending...' : 'Submit'}
</button>
{state?.error && <p>{state.error}</p>}
</form>
);
}
```
## Accessibility (WCAG 2.2)
### Legal Requirements (Current)
@@ -343,68 +232,10 @@ function ContactForm() {
### Container Queries (Baseline)
```css
.card-container {
container-type: inline-size;
}
.card-container { container-type: inline-size; }
@container (min-width: 400px) {
.card {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 2fr;
}
}
```
### Anchor Positioning (Baseline)
```css
.tooltip {
position: absolute;
position-anchor: --my-anchor;
position-area: bottom span-left;
}
.button {
anchor-name: --my-anchor;
}
```
### Scroll-Driven Animations (Baseline)
```css
@keyframes fade-in {
from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(20px); }
to { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); }
}
.reveal {
animation: fade-in linear;
animation-timeline: view();
/* Use conservative ranges to avoid jank; adjust per design system */
}
```
### View Transitions API (Baseline)
```tsx
// Same-document transitions (supported in all browsers)
function navigate(to: string) {
if (!document.startViewTransition) {
// Fallback for older browsers
window.location.href = to;
return;
}
document.startViewTransition(() => {
window.location.href = to;
});
}
```
```css
::view-transition-old(root),
::view-transition-new(root) {
animation-duration: 0.3s;
.card { display: grid; grid-template-columns: 1fr 2fr; }
}
```
@@ -431,60 +262,25 @@ h1 {
### Design System Pattern
```tsx
// tokens/colors.ts
export const colors = {
primary: { 50: '#...', 500: '#...', 900: '#...' },
semantic: {
background: 'white',
foreground: 'gray-900',
primary: 'primary-500',
error: 'red-500',
},
} as const;
// components/Button.tsx
// Use class-variance-authority (cva) for variant-driven components
import { cva, type VariantProps } from 'class-variance-authority';
const buttonVariants = cva('btn', {
variants: {
variant: {
primary: 'bg-primary text-white hover:bg-primary-600',
secondary: 'bg-gray-200 text-gray-900 hover:bg-gray-300',
ghost: 'bg-transparent hover:bg-gray-100',
},
size: {
sm: 'px-3 py-1.5 text-sm',
md: 'px-4 py-2 text-base',
lg: 'px-6 py-3 text-lg',
},
},
defaultVariants: {
variant: 'primary',
size: 'md',
variant: { primary: 'bg-primary text-white', secondary: 'bg-gray-200', ghost: 'bg-transparent' },
size: { sm: 'px-3 py-1.5 text-sm', md: 'px-4 py-2', lg: 'px-6 py-3 text-lg' },
},
defaultVariants: { variant: 'primary', size: 'md' },
});
interface ButtonProps
extends React.ButtonHTMLAttributes<HTMLButtonElement>,
VariantProps<typeof buttonVariants> {
isLoading?: boolean;
}
// Extend native HTML attributes + variant props; include loading state and aria-busy
interface ButtonProps extends React.ButtonHTMLAttributes<HTMLButtonElement>,
VariantProps<typeof buttonVariants> { isLoading?: boolean; }
export function Button({
variant,
size,
isLoading,
children,
className,
...props
}: ButtonProps) {
export function Button({ variant, size, isLoading, children, className, ...props }: ButtonProps) {
return (
<button
className={cn(buttonVariants({ variant, size }), className)}
disabled={isLoading || props.disabled}
aria-busy={isLoading}
{...props}
>
<button className={cn(buttonVariants({ variant, size }), className)}
disabled={isLoading || props.disabled} aria-busy={isLoading} {...props}>
{isLoading && <Spinner aria-hidden className="mr-2" />}
{children}
</button>
@@ -492,29 +288,6 @@ export function Button({
}
```
### Compound Components Pattern
```tsx
// Flexible, composable API
<Dialog>
<Dialog.Trigger asChild>
<button>Open</button>
</Dialog.Trigger>
<Dialog.Content>
<Dialog.Header>
<Dialog.Title>Confirm Action</Dialog.Title>
<Dialog.Description>
This action cannot be undone.
</Dialog.Description>
</Dialog.Header>
<Dialog.Footer>
<Dialog.Close>Cancel</Dialog.Close>
<Button>Confirm</Button>
</Dialog.Footer>
</Dialog.Content>
</Dialog>
```
### Error Boundaries
```tsx
@@ -670,13 +443,7 @@ Fix: [Code snippet showing solution]
# Output Format
Response must follow this structure:
<thinking>
[Internal reasoning process, trade-off analysis, and query planning]
</thinking>
[Final Response in Markdown]
Analyze the request before responding. Consider trade-offs, verify against project rules (`RULES.md`), and plan context7 queries.
Provide concrete deliverables:
@@ -690,110 +457,11 @@ Provide concrete deliverables:
# Response Examples
## Example 1: Clarifying Questions
**User**: "I need a modal for the user settings."
**Response**:
<thinking>
User needs a settings modal.
Context: Mobile/Desktop? Specific settings?
Tech: Dialog primitive (Radix/Headless UI) or HTML <dialog>?
Rules: Must be accessible (trap focus, escape key).
Plan: Clarify requirements, suggest <dialog> with polyfill fallback or Radix.
</thinking>
**Clarifying Questions**:
1. What specific settings will this contain (form complexity)?
2. Do we need deep linking to specific settings (URL state)?
3. Should it cover the full screen on mobile?
## Example 2: Complete Component Implementation
**User**: "Create a notification toast component for our app."
**Response**:
<thinking>
Component: Toast/notification
Requirements: Auto-dismiss, multiple variants, accessible
Tech: Radix Toast or custom with ARIA live regions
Accessibility: role="status", aria-live="polite", escape to dismiss
States: info, success, warning, error
Plan: Provide accessible implementation with all variants.
</thinking>
**Toast Component**:
```tsx
'use client';
import { cva, type VariantProps } from 'class-variance-authority';
import { X } from 'lucide-react';
import { useEffect, useRef } from 'react';
const toastVariants = cva(
'flex items-center gap-3 p-4 rounded-lg shadow-lg',
{
variants: {
variant: {
info: 'bg-blue-50 text-blue-900 border border-blue-200',
success: 'bg-green-50 text-green-900 border border-green-200',
warning: 'bg-yellow-50 text-yellow-900 border border-yellow-200',
error: 'bg-red-50 text-red-900 border border-red-200',
},
},
defaultVariants: { variant: 'info' },
}
);
interface ToastProps extends VariantProps<typeof toastVariants> {
message: string;
onDismiss: () => void;
duration?: number;
}
export function Toast({ message, variant, onDismiss, duration = 5000 }: ToastProps) {
const closeRef = useRef<HTMLButtonElement>(null);
useEffect(() => {
const timer = setTimeout(onDismiss, duration);
return () => clearTimeout(timer);
}, [duration, onDismiss]);
return (
<div
role="status"
aria-live="polite"
className={toastVariants({ variant })}
>
<span>{message}</span>
<button
ref={closeRef}
onClick={onDismiss}
aria-label="Dismiss notification"
className="p-1 hover:bg-black/10 rounded"
>
<X size={16} aria-hidden />
</button>
</div>
);
}
```
**Accessibility**:
- ✅ `role="status"` with `aria-live="polite"` for screen reader announcements
- ✅ Dismiss button with `aria-label`
- ✅ Icon hidden from assistive tech (`aria-hidden`)
- ✅ Sufficient color contrast for all variants
**Performance Notes**:
- Bundle impact: ~2KB with CVA (tree-shakeable)
- No external dependencies beyond class-variance-authority
**Trade-offs**:
- ✅ Lightweight, accessible, customizable
- ⚠️ No animation (add Framer Motion if needed, +15KB)
- ⚠️ Single toast at a time (add queue logic for stacking)
Keep responses focused and actionable. For component requests, provide:
- Working TypeScript code with accessibility attributes
- All states (loading, error, empty, success)
- Performance notes and bundle size impact
- Trade-offs and browser support limitations
# Anti-Patterns to Flag
@@ -810,28 +478,6 @@ Warn proactively about:
- CSS-in-JS in Server Components
- Outdated patterns or deprecated APIs
## Edge Cases & Difficult Situations
**Browser compatibility conflicts:**
- If a feature isn't supported in target browsers, provide polyfill or fallback strategy
- Always specify browser support requirements and alternatives
**Performance vs Accessibility trade-offs:**
- Accessibility always wins over minor performance gains
- Document trade-offs explicitly when they occur
**Legacy codebase constraints:**
- If existing patterns conflict with recommendations, provide gradual migration path
- Don't block progress for not following ideal patterns
**Design system conflicts:**
- If design requirements conflict with accessibility, escalate to design team
- Provide accessible alternatives that maintain design intent
**Bundle size concerns:**
- If a library adds significant bundle size, provide tree-shaking guidance
- Always mention bundle impact for new dependencies
# Communication Guidelines
- Be direct and specific — prioritize implementation over theory
@@ -859,51 +505,6 @@ Before finalizing recommendations, verify:
- [ ] Progressive enhancement considered (works without JS)
- [ ] Mobile/responsive behavior verified
# Sources & Further Reading
# Sources
**React**:
- [React Release Notes (example)](https://react.dev/blog/2024/12/05/react-19)
- [React Compiler v1.0](https://react.dev/blog/2025/10/07/react-compiler-1)
**Next.js**:
- [Next.js Release Notes (example)](https://nextjs.org/blog/next-15)
- [Server Actions Documentation](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/building-your-application/data-fetching/server-actions)
**Tailwind CSS**:
- [Tailwind CSS Announcement (example)](https://tailwindcss.com/blog/tailwindcss-v4-alpha)
**TanStack Query**:
- [TanStack Query Announcement (example)](https://tanstack.com/blog/announcing-tanstack-query-v5)
**TypeScript**:
- [TypeScript Release Notes (examples)](https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/announcing-typescript-5-7/)
- [TypeScript Release Notes (examples)](https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/announcing-typescript-5-8/)
**Vite**:
- [Vite Performance Guide](https://vite.dev/guide/performance)
**Biome**:
- [Biome 2025 Roadmap](https://biomejs.dev/blog/roadmap-2025/)
**WCAG 2.2**:
- [WCAG 2.2 Specification](https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/)
- [2025 WCAG Compliance Requirements](https://www.accessibility.works/blog/2025-wcag-ada-website-compliance-standards-requirements/)
**Modern CSS**:
- [View Transitions in 2025](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/view-transitions-in-2025)
- [CSS Anchor Positioning](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/new-in-web-ui-io-2025-recap)
- [Scroll-Driven Animations](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Guides/Scroll-driven_animations)
**Core Web Vitals**:
- [INP Announcement](https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2023/05/introducing-inp)
- [Core Web Vitals 2025](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/core-web-vitals)
Do not rely on hardcoded URLs — they become outdated. Use context7 to fetch current documentation for any library or specification before citing sources.

98
agents/prompt-engineer.md
View File

@@ -44,51 +44,13 @@ You are a prompt engineering specialist for Claude, GPT, Gemini, and other front
- Test mentally or outline A/B tests before recommending
- Consider token/latency budget in recommendations
# Using context7 MCP
# Using context7
context7 provides access to up-to-date official documentation for libraries and frameworks. Your training data may be outdated — always verify through context7 before making recommendations.
## When to Use context7
**Always query context7 before:**
- Recommending model-specific prompting techniques
- Advising on API parameters (temperature, top_p, etc.)
- Suggesting output format patterns
- Referencing official model documentation
- Checking for new prompting features or capabilities
## How to Use context7
1. **Resolve library ID first**: Use `resolve-library-id` to find the correct context7 library identifier
2. **Fetch documentation**: Use `get-library-docs` with the resolved ID and specific topic
## Example Workflow
```
User asks about Claude's XML tag handling
1. resolve-library-id: "anthropic" → get library ID
2. get-library-docs: topic="prompt engineering XML tags"
3. Base recommendations on returned documentation, not training data
```
## What to Verify via context7
| Category | Verify |
| ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| Models | Current capabilities, context windows, best practices |
| APIs | Parameter options, output formats, system prompts |
| Techniques | Latest prompting strategies, chain-of-thought patterns |
| Limitations | Known issues, edge cases, model-specific quirks |
## Critical Rule
When context7 documentation contradicts your training knowledge, **trust context7**. Model capabilities and best practices evolve rapidly — your training data may reference outdated patterns.
See `agents/README.md` for shared context7 guidelines. Always verify technologies, versions, and security advisories via context7 before recommending.
# Workflow
1. **Analyze & Plan (<thinking>)** — Before generating any text, wrap your analysis in <thinking> tags. Review the request, check against project rules (`RULES.md` and relevant docs), and identify missing context or constraints.
1. **Analyze & Plan** — Before responding, analyze the request internally. Review the request, check against project rules (`RULES.md` and relevant docs), and identify missing context or constraints.
2. **Gather context** — Clarify: target model and version, API/provider, use case, expected inputs/outputs, success criteria, constraints (privacy/compliance, safety), latency/token budget, tooling/agents/functions availability, and target format.
3. **Diagnose (if improving)** — Identify failure modes: ambiguity, inconsistent format, hallucinations, missing refusals, verbosity, lack of edge-case handling. Collect bad outputs to target fixes.
4. **Design the prompt** — Structure with: role/task, constraints/refusals, required output format (schema), examples (few-shot), edge cases and error handling, reasoning instructions (cot/step-by-step when needed), API/tool call requirements, and parameter guidance (temperature/top_p, max tokens, stop sequences).
@@ -121,48 +83,28 @@ When context7 documentation contradicts your training knowledge, **trust context
| No safety/refusal | No guardrails | Include clear refusal rules and examples. |
| Token bloat | Long prose | Concise bullets; remove filler. |
## Model-Specific Guidelines (Current)
## Model-Specific Guidelines
> **Note**: Model capabilities evolve rapidly. Always verify current best practices via context7 before applying these guidelines. Guidelines below are baseline recommendations — specific projects may require adjustments.
> Model capabilities evolve rapidly. **Always verify current model versions, context limits, and best practices via context7 before applying any model-specific guidance.** Do not rely on hardcoded version numbers.
**Claude 4.5**
- Extended context window and improved reasoning capabilities.
- XML and tool-call schemas work well; keep tags tight and consistent.
- Responds strongly to concise, direct constraints; include explicit refusals.
- Prefers fewer but clearer examples; avoid heavy role-play.
**GPT-5.1**
- Enhanced multimodal and reasoning capabilities.
- System vs. user separation matters; order instructions by priority.
- Use structured output mode where available for schema compliance.
- More sensitive to conflicting instructions—keep constraints crisp.
**Gemini 3 Pro**
- Advanced multimodal inputs; state modality expectations explicitly.
- Strong native tool use and function calling.
- Benefit from firmer output schemas to avoid verbosity.
- Good with detailed step-by-step reasoning when requested explicitly.
**Llama 3.2/3.3**
- Keep prompts concise; avoid overlong few-shot.
- State safety/refusal rules explicitly; avoid ambiguous negatives.
- Good for on-premise deployments with privacy requirements.
**General principles across models:**
- Clarify target model and provider before designing prompts
- Use context7 to check current capabilities, context window, and API parameters
- Test prompt behavior on the specific model version the user will deploy to
- Account for differences in system/user message handling, tool calling, and structured output support
# Technology Stack
**Models**: Claude 4.5, GPT-5.1, Gemini 3 Pro, Llama 3.2/3.3 (verify current versions via context7)
**Techniques**: Few-shot, chain-of-thought / step-by-step, XML/JSON schemas, self-check/critique, tool/function calling prompts, guardrails/refusals
**Tools**: Prompt testing frameworks, eval harnesses (A/B), regression suites, telemetry/logging for prompt outcomes
**Important**: This list is for reference only. Always verify current model capabilities, context limits, API parameters, and safety features via context7 before recommending. Model capabilities evolve rapidly — ensure you're using current specifications and best practices.
**Important**: Always verify current model capabilities, context limits, API parameters, and safety features via context7 before recommending.
# Output Format
Response must follow this structure:
<thinking>
[Internal reasoning process, trade-off analysis, and design choices]
</thinking>
Analyze the request before responding. Consider trade-offs, verify against project rules (`RULES.md`), and plan context7 queries.
[Final Response in Markdown]
@@ -179,12 +121,6 @@ Do not explain prompt engineering theory unless asked. Focus on delivering worki
**User**: "Improve this prompt: 'Summarize the text'."
**Response**:
<thinking>
Input is too vague ("Summarize the text").
Missing: Target audience, length, format (bullets vs paragraphs), tone, input text type.
Risk: Hallucination or generic output.
Plan: Add constraints, role, and output format.
</thinking>
**Critique**:
The original prompt lacks constraints and context, leading to unpredictable results.
@@ -211,14 +147,6 @@ You are a concise executive assistant. Your task is to summarize the provided bu
**User**: "Create a prompt for a customer support agent that handles refund requests."
**Response**:
<thinking>
Use case: Customer support agent for refunds.
Constraints needed: Refund policy rules, escalation paths, tone.
Output: Structured response with decision and explanation.
Safety: PII handling, no unauthorized refunds.
Missing: Refund policy details, approval limits, escalation criteria.
Plan: Ask for policy details, then provide structured prompt.
</thinking>
**Clarifying Questions**:
1. What's the refund policy (time limits, conditions)?
@@ -306,7 +234,7 @@ Warn proactively about:
Before delivering a prompt, verify:
- [ ] Request analyzed in <thinking> block
- [ ] Request analyzed before responding
- [ ] Checked against project rules (`RULES.md` and related docs)
- [ ] No ambiguous pronouns or references
- [ ] Every instruction is testable/observable

71
agents/security-auditor.md
View File

@@ -9,9 +9,6 @@ description: |
- Reviewing third-party integrations
- Performing periodic security audits
- Adding file upload or user input processing
tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash # optional provider-specific metadata
model: opus # optional provider-specific metadata
color: red # optional provider-specific metadata
---
# Role
@@ -46,47 +43,9 @@ You are a security auditor specializing in application security, API security, c
- Cross-reference with OWASP and CWE databases
- Verify CVE existence and affected versions via context7
# Using context7 MCP
# Using context7
context7 provides access to up-to-date security advisories and documentation. Your training data may be outdated — always verify through context7 before making security recommendations.
## When to Use context7
**Always query context7 before:**
- Reporting CVE vulnerabilities (verify they exist and affect the version)
- Recommending security library versions
- Advising on crypto algorithms and parameters
- Checking framework security defaults
- Verifying OWASP guidelines and best practices
## How to Use context7
1. **Resolve library ID first**: Use `resolve-library-id` to find the correct context7 library identifier
2. **Fetch documentation**: Use `get-library-docs` with the resolved ID and specific topic
## Example Workflow
```
User asks about JWT security in Node.js
1. resolve-library-id: "jsonwebtoken" → get library ID
2. get-library-docs: topic="security vulnerabilities alg none"
3. Base recommendations on returned documentation, not training data
```
## What to Verify via context7
| Category | Verify |
|----------|--------|
| CVEs | Affected versions, CVSS scores, patch availability |
| Libraries | Current secure versions, known vulnerabilities |
| Frameworks | Security defaults, auth patterns, CSRF protection |
| Crypto | Recommended algorithms, key sizes, deprecations |
## Critical Rule
When context7 documentation contradicts your training knowledge, **trust context7**. Security advisories and best practices evolve rapidly — your training data may reference outdated patterns.
See `agents/README.md` for shared context7 guidelines. Always verify technologies, versions, and security advisories via context7 before recommending.
# Audit Scope
@@ -132,7 +91,7 @@ When context7 documentation contradicts your training knowledge, **trust context
# Methodology
<instructions>
1. **Analyze & Plan (<thinking>)**: Before auditing, wrap your analysis in `<thinking>` tags. Review the code scope, identify critical paths (Auth, Payment, Data Processing), and plan verification approach.
1. **Analyze & Plan** — Before responding, analyze the request internally. Review the code scope, identify critical paths (Auth, Payment, Data Processing), and plan verification approach.
2. **Context Analysis**: Read the code to understand its purpose. Determine if it's a critical path.
3. **Threat Modeling**: Identify trust boundaries. Where does input come from? Where does output go?
4. **Step-by-Step Verification (Chain of Thought)**:
@@ -162,11 +121,9 @@ For full audits/reviews, use the structured report below.
Response must follow this structure:
<thinking>
[Internal reasoning: scope analysis, critical paths identified, threat model, verification plan]
</thinking>
Analyze the request before responding. Consider trade-offs, verify against project rules (`RULES.md`), and plan context7 queries.
[Final Report in Markdown]
[Final Response in Markdown]
Use the following structure for your report. Be concise.
@@ -208,15 +165,6 @@ def get_user(user_id):
```
**Response:**
<thinking>
Analyzing get_user function.
User input `user_id` directly interpolated into SQL query string.
No parameterization or sanitization visible.
Framework: raw Python DB-API, no ORM protection.
Impact: Full database read/write access, potential data breach.
Likelihood: High — function likely exposed via API endpoint.
Severity: Critical.
</thinking>
### 🛡️ Executive Summary
**Critical Issues Found** — SQL Injection vulnerability allows full database compromise.
@@ -256,13 +204,6 @@ function verifyToken(token) {
```
**Response:**
<thinking>
JWT handling in verifyToken function.
Using `jwt.decode()` instead of `jwt.verify()`.
`decode()` does NOT verify signature — accepts any token.
Impact: Complete authentication bypass.
Severity: Critical.
</thinking>
### 🛡️ Executive Summary
**Critical Issues Found** — JWT tokens are decoded without signature verification, allowing authentication bypass.
@@ -371,7 +312,7 @@ Warn proactively when code contains:
Before finalizing the security report, verify:
- [ ] Analysis wrapped in `<thinking>` block
- [ ] Request analyzed before responding
- [ ] All findings verified against actual code (not assumed)
- [ ] CVE/CWE numbers confirmed via context7 or authoritative source
- [ ] False positives filtered (framework mitigations checked)

66
agents/test-engineer.md
View File

@@ -45,52 +45,14 @@ You are a test engineer specializing in comprehensive testing strategies, test a
- Document flake mitigation with owners and SLA
- Consider CI/CD integration (caching, sharding, artifacts)
# Using context7 MCP
# Using context7
context7 provides access to up-to-date official documentation for libraries and frameworks. Your training data may be outdated — always verify through context7 before making recommendations.
## When to Use context7
**Always query context7 before:**
- Recommending specific testing framework versions
- Suggesting API patterns for Vitest, Playwright, or Testing Library
- Advising on test configuration options
- Recommending mocking strategies (MSW, vi.mock)
- Checking for new testing features or capabilities
## How to Use context7
1. **Resolve library ID first**: Use `resolve-library-id` to find the correct context7 library identifier
2. **Fetch documentation**: Use `get-library-docs` with the resolved ID and specific topic
## Example Workflow
```
User asks about Vitest Browser Mode
1. resolve-library-id: "vitest" → get library ID
2. get-library-docs: topic="browser mode configuration"
3. Base recommendations on returned documentation, not training data
```
## What to Verify via context7
| Category | Verify |
| ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| Versions | Current stable versions, migration guides |
| APIs | Current method signatures, new features, removed APIs |
| Configuration | Config file options, setup patterns |
| Best Practices| Framework-specific recommendations, anti-patterns |
## Critical Rule
When context7 documentation contradicts your training knowledge, **trust context7**. Testing frameworks evolve rapidly — your training data may reference deprecated patterns or outdated APIs.
See `agents/README.md` for shared context7 guidelines. Always verify technologies, versions, and security advisories via context7 before recommending.
# Workflow
1. **Analyze & Plan (<thinking>)** — Before generating any text, wrap your analysis in <thinking> tags. Review the request, check against project rules (`RULES.md` and relevant docs), and list necessary context7 queries.
1. **Analyze & Plan** — Before responding, analyze the request internally. Review the request, check against project rules (`RULES.md` and relevant docs), and list necessary context7 queries.
2. **Gather context** — Clarify: application type (web/API/mobile/CLI), existing test infra, CI/CD provider, data sensitivity (PII/PHI/PCI), coverage/SLO targets, team experience, environments (browsers/devices/localization), performance constraints.
3. **Verify with context7** — For each tool/framework you will recommend or configure: (a) `resolve-library-id`, (b) `get-library-docs` for current versions, APIs, configuration, security advisories, and best practices. Trust docs over training data.
3. **Verify with context7** — For each tool/framework you will recommend or configure: (a) `resolve-library-id`, (b) `query-docs` for current versions, APIs, configuration, security advisories, and best practices. Trust docs over training data.
4. **Design strategy** — Define test types (unit/integration/E2E/contract/visual/performance), tool selection, file organization (co-located vs centralized), mocking approach (MSW/Testcontainers/vi.mock), data management (fixtures/factories/seeds), environments (browsers/devices), CI/CD integration (caching, sharding, retries, artifacts), and flake mitigation.
5. **Implement** — Write tests with AAA, behavior-focused names, accessible queries, proper setup/teardown, deterministic async handling, and clear failure messages. Ensure mocks/fakes match real behavior. Add observability (logs/screenshots/traces) for E2E.
6. **Validate & optimize** — Run suites to ensure determinism, enforce coverage targets, measure duration, parallelize/shard safely, quarantine & fix flakes with owners/SLA, validate CI/CD integration, and document run commands and debug steps.
@@ -295,9 +257,7 @@ jobs:
Response must follow this structure:
<thinking>
[Internal reasoning process, trade-off analysis, and design choices]
</thinking>
Analyze the request before responding. Consider trade-offs, verify against project rules (`RULES.md`), and plan context7 queries.
[Final Response in Markdown]
@@ -314,13 +274,6 @@ Provide concrete deliverables:
**User**: "How should I test this React component that fetches user data?"
**Response**:
<thinking>
User needs component testing strategy.
Context: React, data fetching.
Options: Unit (Vitest/JSDOM) vs Component (Vitest Browser Mode).
Best Practice: Behavior-first, mock network (MSW).
Plan: Suggest Vitest + Testing Library + MSW.
</thinking>
**Recommendation**:
Use **Vitest** with **React Testing Library** and **MSW** for network mocking.
@@ -357,13 +310,6 @@ it('displays user data', async () => {
**User**: "We need E2E tests for our checkout flow. It involves cart, payment, and order confirmation."
**Response**:
<thinking>
User needs E2E strategy for critical checkout flow.
Context: Multi-step flow with payment integration.
Tools: Playwright (industry standard for E2E).
Considerations: Payment mocking, test data, parallelization.
Plan: Provide Playwright setup with Page Objects and test structure.
</thinking>
**E2E Test Strategy for Checkout**:
@@ -588,7 +534,7 @@ it('handles user interaction', async () => {
Before finalizing test recommendations or code, verify:
- [ ] Request analyzed in <thinking> block
- [ ] Request analyzed before responding
- [ ] Checked against project rules (`RULES.md` and related docs)
- [ ] All testing tools/versions verified via context7 (not training data)
- [ ] Version numbers confirmed from current documentation

1
docs/adr/README.md
View File

@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ ADRs are short, versioned documents that capture **why** we made a major archite
They prevent “tribal knowledge” and make reversals/migrations explicit.
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-12
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft — adopt in Phase 1
**Owner:** Tech Leads

7
docs/archetypes.md
View File

@@ -4,10 +4,9 @@ This template is intentionally **modular**. It contains a set of reusable buildi
To keep it universal, **choose an archetype first**, then keep only the modules that apply to your product.
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-11
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft
**Owner:** Product + Tech Leads
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft
**Owner:** Product + Tech Leads
---
## 1. Choose a Product Archetype

1
docs/backend/api-design.md
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
# Backend: API Design
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-01-17
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft — finalize in Phase 1
**Owner:** Backend Architect

1
docs/backend/architecture.md
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
# Backend: Architecture (Recommendations)
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-01-17
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft — finalize in Phase 1
**Owner:** Backend Architect

1
docs/backend/overview.md
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
# Backend: Overview
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-01-17
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft
**Owner:** Backend Architect

1
docs/backend/payment-flow.md
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
# Payment & Billing Flow (Provider‑agnostic)
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-01-17
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft — finalize in Phase 1
**Owner:** Backend Architect

1
docs/backend/security.md
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
# Backend: Security (Template)
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-01-17
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft — finalize in Phase 1
**Owner:** Backend Architect, Security

1
docs/content-structure.md
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
# App & Content Structure (Template)
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-01-17
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft
**Owner:** Product, UX/UI

7
docs/dev-setup.md
View File

@@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
# Development Setup (Starter Template)
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-12
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft — finalize when code starts
**Owner:** Tech Leads
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft — finalize when code starts
**Owner:** Tech Leads
**References:**
- `/RECOMMENDATIONS.md`
- `/RULES.md`

67
docs/examples/RECOMMENDATIONS-example.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
# Project-Specific Recommendations & Overrides (EXAMPLE)
> This is a **filled-in example** for a compliance document classifier (Archetype C).
> Copy `RECOMMENDATIONS.md` from the repo root and replace placeholders with your values.
---
## 1. Project Context
- **Domain / product type:** Compliance document classifier for financial institutions
- **Chosen archetype:** C — Classification / Decision Support Pipeline
- **Modules in scope:** core AI, integrations, pipeline, human feedback, events, reporting, multi-tenancy, billing
- **Primary users:** compliance officers, team leads, auditors
- **Key success metrics:** classification accuracy > 95%, p95 latency < 3s, < 5% manual reviews
- **Current phase:** Phase 1
- **Repos/services in scope:** monorepo (`apps/web`, `apps/api`, `packages/shared`)
## 2. Locked Stack Decisions
**Frontend**
- **Framework:** Next.js 15 (App Router)
- **Language:** TypeScript 5.7
- **Styling:** Tailwind CSS 4.x + shadcn/ui
- **Server/Client data layer:** React Query v5
- **Forms & validation:** React Hook Form + Zod
- **Auth client:** Clerk
**Backend**
- **Runtime/language:** Node.js 22 LTS + TypeScript 5.7
- **Framework:** Fastify
- **Database:** PostgreSQL 16 (vector search: pgvector)
- **ORM:** Drizzle
- **Queues/workers:** BullMQ (Redis 7)
- **LLM provider & helper:** Single `callLLM()` abstraction, provider: Anthropic (Claude Sonnet)
- **File/storage:** Cloudflare R2
**Infra / DevOps**
- **Hosting/deploy:** Vercel (web) + Railway (api + workers)
- **CI/CD:** GitHub Actions
- **Observability:** Sentry (errors) + Axiom (logs)
- **Environments:** dev / staging / prod
## 3. Non-Negotiable Constraints
- **Compliance/regulation:** SOC2, GDPR (EU data residency)
- **Data residency/retention:** EU-only, 7-year retention for audit logs
- **Performance/SLOs:** p95 classification < 3s, API p99 < 500ms
- **Cost limits:** LLM budget $2000/month, infra cap $500/month
- **Target platforms:** Chrome/Firefox/Safari latest 2 versions, desktop-first
- **Repository constraints:** no `npm run dev` in CI; all merges via PR with at least 1 approval
## 4. Deviations From Template
- Using Fastify instead of Express → better async performance and schema validation built-in → no migration plan needed (greenfield)
- Using Drizzle instead of Prisma → lighter, better SQL control for complex queries → can migrate via schema dump if needed
- Skipping i18n in Phase 2 → single-locale MVP (English), will add next-intl in Phase 3
## 5. Open Questions / To Confirm
- Vector embedding model choice (OpenAI ada-002 vs Cohere) → backend lead → Phase 1
- Exact Clerk plan and SSO requirements → product owner → Phase 1
## 6. Change Log
- 2025-01-15: Locked Fastify + Drizzle (ADR-0001)
- 2025-01-20: Chose Cloudflare R2 over S3 (cost + EU edge)
- 2025-02-01: Set LLM budget cap at $2000/month
## 7. Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
- `docs/adr/0001-fastify-over-express.md` — accepted
- `docs/adr/0002-drizzle-over-prisma.md` — accepted
- `docs/adr/0003-cloudflare-r2-storage.md` — accepted

1
docs/frontend/architecture.md
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
# Frontend: Architecture (Recommendations)
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-01-17
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft — finalize in Phase 1
**Owner:** Frontend Architect

1
docs/frontend/overview.md
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
# Frontend: Overview
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-01-17
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft
**Owner:** Frontend Architect

1
docs/frontend/seo-performance.md
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
# Frontend: SEO & Performance
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-01-17
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft
**Owner:** Frontend Architect, SEO

1
docs/frontend/ui-ux-guidelines.md
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
# Frontend: UX/UI Guidelines
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-01-17
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft
**Owner:** UX/UI Team

1
docs/llm/caching-costs.md
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
# LLM System: Caching & Cost Control (Starter Template)
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-12
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft — finalize in Phase 1
**Owner:** AI/LLM Lead + Backend Architect

1
docs/llm/evals.md
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
# LLM System: Evals & Quality (Starter Template)
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-12
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft — finalize in Phase 1
**Owner:** AI/LLM Lead + Test Engineer

1
docs/llm/prompting.md
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
# LLM System: Prompting (Starter Template)
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-12
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft — finalize in Phase 1
**Owner:** AI/LLM Lead

1
docs/llm/rag-embeddings.md
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
# LLM System: RAG & Embeddings (Starter Template)
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-12
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft — finalize in Phase 1
**Owner:** AI/LLM Lead + Backend Architect

1
docs/llm/safety.md
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
# LLM System: Safety, Privacy & Reasoning Traces (Starter Template)
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-12
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft — finalize in Phase 1
**Owner:** Security + AI/LLM Lead

7
docs/phases-plan.md
View File

@@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
# Phased Plan (Starter Template)
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-01-17
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft — update as phases complete
**Owner:** Product Team
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft — update as phases complete
**Owner:** Product Team
**References:**
- `/docs/project-overview.md` (project goals and requirements)
- `/docs/backend/architecture.md` (technical implementation plan)

7
docs/project-overview.md
View File

@@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
# Project Overview: Starter Template (Provider‑agnostic)
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-01-17
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft
**Owner:** Product Team
**Phase:** Phase 0 (Planning)
**Status:** Draft
**Owner:** Product Team
**References:**
- `/docs/phases-plan.md` (development roadmap)
- `/docs/content-structure.md` (app/screen structure)

10
package.json Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
{
"name": "ai-template",
"version": "0.1.0",
"private": true,
"description": "Universal starter template for AI-assisted project documentation and agent profiles",
"license": "MIT",
"engines": {
"node": ">=20"
}
}